onSite Reviews: grimstone.net

[zieglarf]

That's true. Good point. We might as well review sites that are not even comic related. The design is what we are looking at...

It's not a poke at you Mike. I was already reading your comic before the 'site' review. I just don't see the point of reviewing inactive or 'on hiatus' comics (sites).

[CorvusErebus]

Please don't be maliciously facetious.

Because the design IS what we're looking at. We are looking at the art and science of designing a website to effectively deliver a webcomic. I don't care if the comic updates, or looks bad, or has bad writing. It just has to be designed to deliver a comic. The information is relevant to you regardless of the featured comics update schedule or quality. So long as it effectively (or ineffectively) achieves its purpose.

We might as well review sites that are not even comic related.

Those reviews WOULDN'T be relevant, now would they? 

[zieglarf]

Yes they would be relevant.

There are many sites we can learn from even if they are not a comic site. They can make use of designs that can easily be incorporated into a comic site. They can also show us things to avoid.

At any rate, it just makes sense to me to review an active comic site.

[CorvusErebus]

I think you missed my point.

Since the content of the review will be 100% unaffected by the update schedule, be it Daily, Hourly, Yearly, or once per decade, The reviews will continue, ignoring update habits or quality.

[zieglarf]

No. I understood your point perfectly.

I just have a different opinion, that's all. 

[mwytrykus]

And we agree to disagree and move on.